pe anti mouse cxcr2 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Pe Anti Mouse Cxcr2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 9 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pe+conjugated+anti+mouse+cxcr2/Mouse+CXCR2%2FIL-8RB+PE-conjugated+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2025__02__20__639389-319-83-86
Average 93 stars, based on 9 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Autocrine CXCL1-CXCR2 Signaling Mediates Leptomeningeal Resistance to Radiation Therapy"
Article Title: Autocrine CXCL1-CXCR2 Signaling Mediates Leptomeningeal Resistance to Radiation Therapy
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.02.20.639389
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Histogram of immune cell types present within the LM microenvironment at 1 week after inoculation of LLC-LeptoM compared to naïve controls (received i/cist injection of PBS) quantified by flow cytometry. Data represent mean ± SEM. t -test. n = 6. ns = not significant. Neut = neutrophils; NK = natural killer cells; DC = dendritic cells; Mono = monocytes; Mac = macrophages. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell types present within the LM microenvironment at 1 week after inoculation of 4T1-LeptoM compared to naïve controls quantified by flow cytometry. Data are presented as percentages and represent mean ± SEM. t -test. n = 5. ns = not significant. (C) Histogram of Cxcr2 expressing immune cells within the LM microenvironment 1 week after inoculation of LLC-LeptoM and naive controls quantified by flow cytometry. Data represent mean ± SEM. n = 6 per each condition. (D) Immune cell Cxcr2 expression within the leptomeningeal microenvironment 1 week after inoculation of 4T1-LeptoM and naive controls as quantified by flow cytometry. Data represent mean ± SEM. n = 5 per each condition. (E) Tumor growth of wildtype (WT) and mice lacking Cxcr2 expression in immune cells (Cxcr2 KO) quantified by BLI. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. WT n = 9; Cxcr2 KO n = 4. p = 0.0002. (F) Histogram of Cxcr2 expressing cells in LLC-LeptoM and 4T1-LeptoM cell lines when cells were grown in vitro, as quantified by flow cytometry. LLC-LeptoM: n = 4 independent experiments. 4T1-LeptoM: n = 3 independent experiments. (G) Histogram of Cxcr2 expressing cells in LLC-LeptoM and 4T1-LeptoM cell lines quantified by flow cytometry at different time points after i/cist inoculation of cancer cells. LLC-LeptoM: n = 5; 4T1-LeptoM: n = 5 per time point.
Techniques Used: Injection, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, In Vitro
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Percentage of Cxcr2 expressing (Cxcr2+) LLC-LeptoM cells before (initial) and after i/cist inoculation as quantified by flow cytometry. Initial: n = 4 independent experiments. i/cist: n = 5 per time point. (B) Percentage of Cxcr2+ 4T1-LeptoM cells before (initial) and after i/cist inoculation as quantified by flow cytometry. Initial: n = 4 independent experiments. i/cist: n = 5 per time point. (C) Tumor growth of selected Cxcr2+, Cxcr2 negative (Cxcr2-) and the original heterogeneous (Hetero) LLC-LeptoM cells as quantified by BLI. Data represent mean ± SEM analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Hetero: n = 9; Cxcr2-n = 8; Cxcr2+ n = 8. Hetero vs Cxcr2- p = 0.5433; Hetero vs Cxcr2+ p <0.0001; Cxcr2-vs Cxcr2+. p < 0.0001. (D) Tumor growth of selected Cxcr2+, Cxcr2 negative (Cxcr2-) and the original heterogeneous (Hetero) 4T1-LeptoM cells as quantified by BLI. Data represent mean ± SEM analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Hetero: n = 9; Cxcr2-n = 8; Cxcr2+ n = 8. Hetero vs Cxcr2- p = 0.5466; Hetero vs Cxcr2+ p <0.0001; Cxcr2-vs Cxcr2+. p < 0.0001. (E) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot showing distinct transcriptional clustering of Cxcr2- and Cxcr2+ cell populations in both LLC-LeptoM and 4T1-LeptoM cell lines. (F) Left: Histogram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Cxcr2- and Cxcr2+ cells in LLC-LeptoM and 4T1-LeptoM cell lines. Right: Venn diagram illustrating unique and shared DEGs between LeptoM cells lines. (G) Gene ontology analysis of top 20 significantly enriched pathways in Cxcr2+ cells of LLC-LeptoM (left) and 4T1-LeptoM (right).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Experimental treatment scheme illustrating i/cist treatment with Cxcr2 inhibitor SB265610 (SB) or vehicle (Veh) in LLC-LeptoM model. Treatments were co-injected with cancer cells and maintained for 2 weeks. (B) Left: Tumor growth as quantified by BLI. Right: Representative BLI images 3 weeks after inoculation of cancer cells. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Veh n = 8; SB n = 8. p < 0.0001. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mice in ( B ). p < 0.0001. (D) Scheme showing the paradigm of late treatment with Cxcr2 inhibitor SB with or without CSI (10 Gy delivered as 2 Gy × 5 fractions). Treatments initiated one week after inoculation of cancer cells and continued for 2 weeks. (E) Left: Tumor growth quantified by BLI. Right: Representative BLI images 3 weeks after inoculation of cancer cells. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. SH + Veh n = 9; CSI + Veh n = 9; SH + SB n = 9; CSI + SB n = 8. SH + Veh vs CSI + Veh p = 0.0371; SH + Veh vs SH + SB p = 0.0237; SH + Veh vs CSI + SB p = 0.0143. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mice in ( E ). SH + Veh vs CSI + Veh p = 0. 4338; SH + Veh vs SH + SB p = 0.7390; SH + Veh vs CSI + SB p = 0.0050. (G) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing the overall survival of LM patients stratified based on the percentage of CXCR2 expression in cancer cells (EpCAM+/CXCR2+) in CSF prior to pCSI. CXCR2 low (less than 1%) n = 10; CXCR2 high (more than 1%) n = 8. p = 0.0353. mo = month.
Techniques Used: Injection, Expressing
Related Articles
Clinical Proteomics:Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Membrane:Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Expressing:Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Staining:Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with Article Title: Munc13-4 Is a Rab11-binding Protein That Regulates Rab11-positive Vesicle Trafficking and Docking at the Plasma Membrane Article Snippet: .. To analyze the plasma membrane expression of CXCR2, cells were blocked in ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA, and stained with |


